A Review Of CES Letter DeBunking

A Review Of CES Letter DeBunking

Blog Article

You understand that it’s terrible when even Oaks awkwardly and freely admits, “that looks like religious censorship also.”

Jacobs – a superb male – by marrying, possessing sexual intercourse with, and using a kid with his lawfully married wife, whom he liked dearly? Anyone who thinks This is certainly tolerable and appropriate lacks empathy and basic human decency.

Why is FairMormon misrepresenting the issue by earning the unsubstantiated and unsupported declare that there was no sexual intercourse or Bodily intimacy within the polyandrous marriages when even Mormon apologists and scholars on polygamy are mostly on the “Indeed” or “perhaps” side?

This is often all Wrong. The truth is that I really was approached by a CES Director in March 2013 And that i wrote a doc that will afterwards come to be often known as the CES Letter

It was wrong to stay away from plural marriage for worldly, egocentric good reasons, like believing the Church would fail, and hoping to get political or financial rewards afterward.

Elder Holland attempts to paint the SCMC as mostly an anti-polygamist team; having said that, that does not quite align with Elder Oaks' "clipping service" assert:

This is the two Phony and misleading. Let’s pull up the Doctrine & Covenants 132 verse that FairMormon made a decision to go away out in their response:

It delivers troubles front and Middle. If Every single problem and question was a tree, it experienced the result of exhibiting The full forest of trees simultaneously. When you see that A great deal and they are hit with a great deal cognitive dissonance it’s challenging to reconcile all of it. Particularly when you know that this CES Director had no responses. Jeremy Runnells does include his personal conclusion that “I desperately looked for responses to all of the problems. To me, The solution finally arrived however it wasn't what I expected…or hoped for.”

Incorrect: Zina didn’t marry Joseph as a result of a “flaming sword” danger. Zina herself Obviously CES Letter DeBunking explains The premise for her choice:

I would really agree Together with the CES letter’s basic notion, which the Mormonism it can be responding to is unsustainable. Wherever I disagree is always that I don’t Consider the Mormonism it truly is responding to is actually the actual, only, or inescapable Mormonism. Certainly, which was some people’s Mormonism, nevertheless it’s not my Mormonism, and I don’t Believe it’s the Mormonism that is going to endure in long term decades and hundreds of years.

One can perform to correct them by Several other suggests, but don’t go about indicating that they misbehaved every time they had been a youngster or regardless of what. Well, obviously, that feels like religious censorship also.

FairMormon “Attract Ridicule” charge is legitimate only by having out and isolating that statement away from my letter, like They only did. FairMormon’s “Appeal to Ridicule” charge will not be legitimate when that sentence is taken into context with my full letter.

I tried to depart it all over again in the summer of 2013 (immediately after it commenced becoming a lot more apparent the CES Director wasn't going to reply) but then FairMormon started off attacking me.

FairMormon Also fails to justify the Church’s not enough transparency with its funds as well as the Church’s questionable expenditure of $1.